The 2020 Covid PLandemic, An Awakening Call?

As for the Lebanese hospital deaths over the past couple of years, a friend graciously provided me with the below charts. You can find the original Twitter post by Shant Assadourian here. We are indeed being hammered with numbers and many times, they simply don't add up. Try observing the current numbers of "new" daily infections in Lebanon, after a total lockdown of the country has been enforced and you will quickly conclude that such measures are not generating the expected outcome. Or are they?...

Fast rewind. By mid-March 2020, airports were shut down and we would remain grounded for several months. Businesses in all countries were disrupted. Many were stranded and struggled to get back to their homes. Needless to say, the situation was alarming. The number of new daily cases was growing at distressing rates in several countries and the fear campaigns were unleashed all over the world. Since then, we have been repeatedly told, and brainwashed to believe, that we need to stay home unless absolutely necessary to venture out, that it's better to keep social distance and when we really, really, had to step out of our homes or safe places, we had the responsibility to mask up and avoid infecting others or being infected by them. Let's pause for a moment and consider each argument apart.

1. First lockdowns, stopping air travel

Airplanes are closed spaces where people are seated very close to each other, especially in the coach areas, and the idea to avoid transporting the virus from one country/continent to another was the main argument. First, it took a couple of weeks to repatriate expats who preferred returning to their homes. Second, came the no flying for all, except diplomats - they might not be human, you know - and cargo. What happened to all the people who kept working to ensure the seamless flow of production and deliveries all around the world? Gradually, confined people started traveling again with an extra set of measures before and after boarding a plane and also when entering airport premises. Except even after getting back to more normalized traffic, Covid rates were still going up. So what did reducing air traffic and people movement restrictions achieve? Not much apparently. Additionally, many incongruences can be noted when it comes to traveling. If someone complied with the PCR and tested negative right before they boarded, how do they test positive upon arrival, when they abided by the "safety" regulations that were imposed and it takes at least 3 to 5 days to spot a Covid infection?

2. Staying home and closing businesses

Furthermore, to restraining our "free" mobility, we were ordered to stay home. Industries were no longer able to operate. People should not be gathering in non-open spaces and restaurants were temporarily closed. Those reliant on daily wages were hit the hardest and several governments were able to assist the most vulnerable with small financial aid for a short while. The weight of such governmental decisions could only affect the economies worldwide in a negative way. Countries such as Germany saw their economies retract immensely. Hundreds of companies had to file for bankruptcy, many not even able to pay laid-off employees as per legal requirements. Poverty is on the rise everywhere... A positive impact of such decisions was the fact that pollution levels also went down globally and online businesses boomed and even hired manpower like crazy. After all, you need to comply with governmental rulings but who said anything about (over)consumption? Keep in mind that you can absolutely not visit your old parents or family members because you could be an asymptomatic carrier of the fatal virus and harm them. No more family gatherings for festivities or mournings. No more holding the hand of your old sick relative at the hospital or the nursing home because you might catch the virus. How many broken hearts and regrets have ensued from those directives?

3. Wash your hands, keep social distance at all times and mask up

After a while, the lockdowns were gradually dropped. In the (unfortunate) event that you did have to get out of your home, whether for work, to get your groceries, or simply visiting family members, it was not only recommended but highly battered that you needed to avoid coming close to fellow humans. Keep your distance to be safe! You cannot enter a bank, a supermarket, or be in a closed space if you are not wearing a mask, and sometimes even latex gloves. Plus, you will have to undergo a quick "temperature" check and maybe even a fast "disinfection" stream. Some of these rules, like wearing gloves and being sanitized, have in the meantime been abandoned, lucky us! But you would still be refused entry to a public space unless you are properly "geared up". Even for people who survived a Covid-19 infection, some immunologists recommend the mask because while re-infection is unusual, it still can happen. A lot of controversial articles were published concerning masks and how they supposedly protect us, or not, from being affected by the virus. A simple line of questioning can be brought forward here: if the masks do protect, why the six feet distancing rule? And if the latter works, why the masks? And if they both work, what are the lockdowns for? How can the rates of contaminated people still rise after we have been diligently masking, distancing, and isolating?

4. Our only salvation ... the vaccine?

The meds that are administered to the Covid-19 patients for a couple of weeks are mostly Zinc, Vitamin D, calcium, and some other supplements. How is that? If this virus is more dangerous than the flu, which by the way kills yearly many more people, shouldn't antibiotics and a "stronger" cocktail of medication i.e. chemicals be resorted to? How is it possible to have concocted a "miracle" vaccine in less than 9 months when almost everyone agrees that we still do not have enough data on the virus and its possible mutations? Even Dr. Fauci, the Director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, who is considered an immunology expert, recently declared that even when you will get the injection, you will not be immune from catching the virus. You will be likely to get milder symptoms. Because what these shots are in fact is a synthetic mRNA coated with a product named PEG and will only reduce symptoms in the recipient without providing the recipient with any immunity. Again, if public health guidelines that were applied worked, what are the rushed injections for? And how come we do not test them on lab rats and accept that they are tested on the older populations? If these vials are safe, what is the no liability clause for? Is it to protect big pharma corporations, which have so many deaths on their conscience and in several instances? You can check the history of AstraZeneca, Moderna, and even Pfizer for added critical thinking. Shouldn't the so-called experts be looking after the general well-being of the people? How can they do that when they entrust our sake to businessmen like Bill Gates? From a business point of view, the more vials are manufactured and sold, the more profit there is. Like the business of the masks that was later on debunked for not being an efficient secure measure. And what about people who are suddenly dying days after being inoculated with the "vaccine" in the USA, the UK, or Norway? And the 5% who would suffer from secondary effects from their received injections?

5. Digital passports

Like the paper counterpart, that was required to travel to certain countries in Africa and Latin America, newer technologies will allow us to keep vaccine records online. This information can be shared with selected parties, like airlines or border patrol, when needed. Since many travelers started faking Covid test results by the end of 2020 to travel, it became necessary to create a standard digital health passport to ensure the validity of vaccination and safeguard against theft or loss. This will permit journeying with fewer papers to be carried around. And as of Thursday, "Microsoft, Oracle, Salesforce join the effort to develop Covid-19 vaccination digital passport". You can read the details here. This is only the first step in commanding the right to free movement. After all, no government advocated openly that vaccinations were mandatory. But if you want to cross borders, you will need your valid digital health passport. This is not very far from dictating that we ought to be vaccinated to use public transportation, go for a walk at a nearby park or even attend class at a school. There is a large ongoing debate on whether children should be vaccinated before returning to their classes in school or not. No unanimity has been reached on that matter yet. From the history of vaccines, we need to remain very cautious, especially when we take into consideration the plethora of "new" diseases like autism, ever since it was determined that all children needed to be vaccinated, multiple times...  

Because of all of the above, labeling the situation at hand as a pLandemic, rather than a pandemic, which it doesn't seem to be, arises from the simple fact that the authorities have not even tried to calm the anxious populations with science. Quite the opposite. They have chosen the alternative of creating mass despair, discrediting any expert opposing their proclamations, and extensively proposed "solutions" that have yielded in amplifying the infection rates. Here is a video comparing the flu of 2017 and Covid in France. Kindly note that it's in French. So where is the logic in all this? When people are dehumanized by separating them from loved ones and enforcing their social isolation? When most illnesses could be addressed by a change of lifestyle and food intake and we choose to ingest more chemicals, which have more side effects on our health than benefits? When poor people are becoming poorer and rich people richer? When economies are on the brink of collapsing, especially with the small enterprises not able to sustain being closed and the banking sector and its services seeming to be currently outdated? Moreover, how do we accept to live in fear of a virus that causes such a low death rate? And of which more than 99.9% naturally recover? What makes us accepts being controlled this way? Little by little, the general sentiment is that we are living under a rule that is Nazi-like. It's Big Brother as predicted in George Orwell's dystopia. Believe it or not, it is named "The Great Reset" and it's part of an ongoing Agenda. Mainstream media is regulated to feed us what we need to know to remain submissive and not about what is really taking place. One cannot but wonder, is the Covid virus a vampire that crawls out only at night? What is the purpose of the imposed curfews starting the late hours of the afternoon till dawn/sunrise? Luckily, people around the world are waking up and taking a stance. Several large protests took place in Berlin, Paris, London, and Montreal before the end of 2020. A glimmer of light at the horizon is the insubordinations that are arising in 2021. For instance, in the past couple of days, Italian restaurants and small businesses, like gyms, for example, have been refusing to observe the curfews imposed. I will end this long exposé with a quote from Athena Singh, "Do not trust your fears. They do not know your strength". And remember, when you place a diamond in a box, it becomes a jewelry box. When you fill it with waste, it becomes a trash recipient. It is the same with our heads: we become our thoughts and the beliefs we keep inside us...